Pound v. Holladay
This text of 444 F.2d 234 (Pound v. Holladay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
444 F.2d 234
Evoila Wilson POUND, on behalf of her son David Lee Pound et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Charles HOLLADAY, as Superintendent of Education of the Tupelo Municipal Separate School District et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 71-1434 Summary Calendar.*
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
June 22, 1971.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi; Orma R. Smith, District Judge, 322 F.Supp. 1000.
James A. Lewis, John C. Brittain, Jr., Oxford, Miss., for plaintiffs-appellants.
W. P. Mitchell, Mitchell, Rogers & Eskridge, Tupelo, Miss., for defendants-appellees.
Before THORNBERRY, MORGAN and CLARK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Affirmed. See Local Rule 21.1
Notes:
Rule 18, 5th Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5 Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I
See NLRB v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 5 Cir. 1970, 430 F.2d 966
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
444 F.2d 234, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9389, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pound-v-holladay-ca5-1971.