Poulsen v. Lighthouse Assembly at High Falls

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Poulsen v. Lighthouse Assembly at High Falls

72 A.D.3d 1594, 899 N.Y.S.2d 712

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 30, 2010

StatusPublished

This text of 72 A.D.3d 1594 (Poulsen v. Lighthouse Assembly at High Falls) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Poulsen v. Lighthouse Assembly at High Falls, 72 A.D.3d 1594, 899 N.Y.S.2d 712 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Timothy J. Drury, J.), entered March 27, 2009 in a personal injury action. The order denied the motion of defendant for a change of venue.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: We conclude that Supreme Court properly denied defendant’s motion for a change of venue of this action from Erie County to Monroe County. Defendant failed to meet its “burden of demonstrating that the convenience of material witnesses would be better served by the change” (Davis v Firman, 53 AD3d 1101, 1102 [2008] [internal quotation marks omitted]; see CPLR 510 [3]; Rochester Drug Coop., Inc. v Marcott Pharmacy N. Corp., 15 AD3d 899 [2005]). Present — Smith, J.P., Fahey, Carni, Sconiers and Pine, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Timothy J. Drury, J.), entered March 27, 2009 in a personal injury action. The order denied the motion of defendant for a change of venue.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: We conclude that Supreme Court properly denied defendant’s motion for a change of venue of this action from Erie County to Monroe County. Defendant failed to meet its “burden of demonstrating that the convenience of material witnesses would be better served by the change” (Davis v Firman, 53 AD3d 1101, 1102 [2008] [internal quotation marks omitted]; see CPLR 510 [3]; Rochester Drug Coop., Inc. v Marcott Pharmacy N. Corp., 15 AD3d 899 [2005]). Present — Smith, J.P., Fahey, Carni, Sconiers and Pine, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

72 A.D.3d 1594, 899 N.Y.S.2d 712, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/poulsen-v-lighthouse-assembly-at-high-falls-nyappdiv-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack