Poulos v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Poulos v. State

95 S.E. 738, 22 Ga. App. 239, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 268

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedApril 12, 1918

Docket9589

StatusPublished

This text of 95 S.E. 738 (Poulos v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Poulos v. State, 95 S.E. 738, 22 Ga. App. 239, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 268 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, P. J.

1. There is no merit in that ground of the motion for a new trial which alleges that “the venue was not proved or the offense shown to have been committed within the statute of limitations.”

2. The verdict was amply supported by the evidence, and the court did not err in refusing to grant a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Bloodworth and Harwell, JJ., concur.

Accusation, of misdemeanor; from city court of Savannah— Judge Rourke. February 2, 1918.

Shelby Myriclc, for plaintiff in error. Walter 0. Ilartridge, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI