Poulo v. State

180 S.E. 246, 51 Ga. App. 279, 1935 Ga. App. LEXIS 665
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 21, 1935
Docket24804
StatusPublished

This text of 180 S.E. 246 (Poulo v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Poulo v. State, 180 S.E. 246, 51 Ga. App. 279, 1935 Ga. App. LEXIS 665 (Ga. Ct. App. 1935).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The defendant was charged with possessing whisky. The case was tried by the judge of the criminal court of Atlanta, without the intei'vention of a jury, and a judgment finding the defendant guilty was rendered. The evidence adduced authorized the judgment, and the judge of the superior court did not err in overruling the certiorari.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre and Guerry, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
180 S.E. 246, 51 Ga. App. 279, 1935 Ga. App. LEXIS 665, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/poulo-v-state-gactapp-1935.