Poullard Jr. v. Howard
Opinion
Southern District of Texas ENTERED IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT November 03, 2021 FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS Nathan Ochsner, Clerk . HOUSTON DIVISION RODNEY POULLARD, Jr., § Plaintiff, : Vs. CIVIL ACTION NO. H-20-454 CASEY HOWARD, et al., :
Defendants. : ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION This court has reviewed the Memorandum and Recommendation of Judge Sam S. Sheldon signed on October 6, 2021, and made a de novo determination. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72; 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219 (5th Cir. 1989). Based on the pleadings, the record, and the applicable law, the court adopts the Memorandum and Recommendation as this court’s Memorandum and Order. This court finds and concludes that Judge Sheldon’s decision denying Rodney Poullard, Jr.’s motion to reopen case is amply supported by substantial evidence in the record and that Judge Sheldon properly applied the legal standards. Poullard’s Motion to
Reopen Case, Docket Entry No. 17, is denied. SIGNED on November 1, 2021, at Houston, Texas.
eo Chief United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Poullard Jr. v. Howard (Poullard Jr. v. Howard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.