Poulas v. James Lenox House, Inc.

11 A.D.3d 332, 783 N.Y.S.2d 28, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12195
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 19, 2004
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 11 A.D.3d 332 (Poulas v. James Lenox House, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Poulas v. James Lenox House, Inc., 11 A.D.3d 332, 783 N.Y.S.2d 28, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12195 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward Lehner, J.), entered January 13, 2004, which confirmed an order of the Special Referee directing nonparty respondent Levy, Phillips & Konigsberg, LLP to pay nonparty appellant Ginsberg & Broome, PC. $10,333.33 as its share of the contingent attorney fee award paid pursuant to the settlement of this action, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The motion court properly exercised its discretion in confirming the Special Referee’s findings that the minimal work performed by the outgoing law firm Ginsberg & Broome, PC. in the prosecution of the plaintiffs personal injury claim entitled it to only a thirtieth of the total contingency fees paid based on the settlement obtained for plaintiff. The outgoing firm merely filed and served a three-page summons and complaint in the action and obtained some medical records during the 11 months it served as plaintiffs attorney. The incoming firm, Levy, Phillips & Konigsberg, LLP, by contrast, inter alia, responded to [333]*333defendants’ discovery requests, conducted approximately 10 depositions, retained experts on liability and damages, conducted voir dire, engaged in settlement negotiations and secured a highly favorable settlement for plaintiff, whose injuries, although serious, were difficult to establish clinically (see Matter of Haywoode [Frost & Berenholtz], 225 AD2d 420 [1996]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Lerner, Friedman, Marlow and Gonzalez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pyong Woo Ye v. Pasha
2019 NY Slip Op 6425 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
DeJesus v. Bridge
109 A.D.3d 754 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
Shabazz v. City of New York
94 A.D.3d 569 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
11 A.D.3d 332, 783 N.Y.S.2d 28, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12195, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/poulas-v-james-lenox-house-inc-nyappdiv-2004.