Poughkeepsie Savings Bank v. Herron
This text of 176 N.E. 416 (Poughkeepsie Savings Bank v. Herron) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In two actions by plaintiff to foreclose mortgages, defendant Wener Holding Co., Inc., interposed defenses but defaulted on the trial. After judgments, including awards of additional allowance for $961.75 in one action and $2,000 in the other, had been entered in favor of plaintiff, defendant moved at Special Term to vacate and set aside the judgments in so far as they award additional allowances. The motions were denied but the orders denying them were reversed on the law.
*341 The Special Term was empowered in its discretion, pursuant to section 1513, subdivision 2, Civil Practice Act, to award additional allowances in these sums. An action to foreclose a mortgage is one specified in this section, defenses were interposed and the sums awarded do not exceed five per centum of the value of the subject-matter involved. When a defense has been interposed in this kind of action, subdivision 2 does not require that the case be difficult and extraordinary. It is only in cases where no defense has been interposed that the provisions of subdivision 1 are applicable. No error of law, therefore, was committed at Special Term.
The orders of the Appellate Division should be reversed and those of the Special Term affirmed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division.
Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Lehman, Kellogg, O’Brien and Hubbs, JJ., concur.
Ordered accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
176 N.E. 416, 256 N.Y. 339, 1931 N.Y. LEXIS 1063, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/poughkeepsie-savings-bank-v-herron-ny-1931.