Poughkeepsie Savings Bank v. Cohen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Poughkeepsie Savings Bank v. Cohen

229 A.D. 789

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1930·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order denying appellant’s application to vacate that part of the judgment, dated September 7,1929, which awards an additional allowance of $961.75 to the plaintiff, reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, in so far as it denies such application, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. The additional allowance was improper and the application to vacate or set aside “ the erroneous and illegal part of the judgment was legal and regular.” (Herpe v. Herpe, 225 N. Y. 323.) Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Kapper, Hagarty and Scudder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying appellant’s application to vacate that part of the judgment, dated September 7,1929, which awards an additional allowance of $961.75 to the plaintiff, reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, in so far as it denies such application, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. The additional allowance was improper and the application to vacate or set aside “ the erroneous and illegal part of the judgment was legal and regular.” (Herpe v. Herpe, 225 N. Y. 323.) Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Kapper, Hagarty and Scudder, JJ., concur.

Poughkeepsie Savings Bank v. Cohen, 229 A.D. 789 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

229 A.D. 789 (Poughkeepsie Savings Bank v. Cohen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related