Poughkeepsie Savings Bank v. Cohen
This text of 228 A.D. 709 (Poughkeepsie Savings Bank v. Cohen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order modifying judgment dated September 7, 1929, reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs, upon the ground that the court was without power to make an order amending the judgment so as to affect its substance. (Herpe v. Herpe, 225 N. Y. 323.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty and Carswell, JJ., concur; Seudder, J., dissents, with the following memorandum: There is no basis for the additional allowance made to plaintiff except to the extent of $200 under subdivision 1 of section 1513 of the Civil Practice Act. The correction sought is rot a matter of substance. The order should be modified by reducing the allowance to $200.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
228 A.D. 709, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/poughkeepsie-savings-bank-v-cohen-nyappdiv-1930.