Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Poughkeepsie Iron Fabricators, Inc. v. 515 Seventh Associates

Poughkeepsie Iron Fabricators, Inc. v. 515 Seventh Associates

158 A.D.2d 404, 551 N.Y.S.2d 239, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1853
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 22, 1990
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 158 A.D.2d 404 (Poughkeepsie Iron Fabricators, Inc. v. 515 Seventh Associates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Poughkeepsie Iron Fabricators, Inc. v. 515 Seventh Associates, 158 A.D.2d 404, 551 N.Y.S.2d 239, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1853 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

[405]*405While ordinarily leave to amend pleadings should be freely given absent prejudice or surprise to the adverse party, we find no abuse of the IAS court’s discretion in denying such leave. Far from being adverse parties, Poughkeepsie and Robico had cooperated as coplaintiffs for almost 18 months. Under the circumstances, the surprise and prejudice to Robico is self-evident. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Milonas, Asch, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jones v. Story
241 A.D.2d 853 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
158 A.D.2d 404, 551 N.Y.S.2d 239, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1853, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/poughkeepsie-iron-fabricators-inc-v-515-seventh-associates-nyappdiv-1990.