Pough v. Aegis Property Services Corp.
This text of 186 A.D.2d 52 (Pough v. Aegis Property Services Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Kristin Booth Glen, J.), entered on or about February 28, 1991, which in an action to recover brokerage commissions, granted plaintiff’s motion, inter alia, for partial summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Defendant argues that the IAS Court erred in granting [53]*53plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment because of the court’s denial of a prior motion for summary judgment that had raised the same issues. Although, as a matter of policy, multiple summary judgment motions are discouraged in the absence of newly discovered evidence or "other sufficient cause” (Marine Midland Bank v Fisher, 85 AD2d 905, 906), the policy "has no application where, as here, the first motion, made before discovery, is denied on the ground of the existence of a factual issue which, through later uncovering of the facts, is resolved or eliminated” (Freeze Right Refrig. & Air Conditioning Servs. v City of New York, 101 AD2d 175, 181). Plaintiffs evidence demonstrated his right to commissions earned in accordance with the amended agreement, under which defendant Miller is a guarantor, and Miller’s failure, after discovery, to submit any evidence in support of his contentions in opposition thereto warranted the grant of partial summary judgment in favor of plaintiff. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Rosenberger, Ross and Kassal, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
186 A.D.2d 52, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pough-v-aegis-property-services-corp-nyappdiv-1992.