Potts's Appeal

30 Pa. 168
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided July 1, 1858·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

— The decree of the court below is so well justified by the reasons assigned in the opinion of the learned president, showing that the devise in question passes a fee tail in the real estate, and an absolute interest in the personal property, that we do not feel called upon to add anything to it. Our own recent decisions are quite numerous in favour of the conclusion, at which he has arrived: 20 State R. 509; 23 Id. 9, 31, 338; 24 Id. 244, 248, 252; 26 Id. 227; 28 Id. 73, 93, 101.

Decree affirmed at the costs of the appellants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Potts's Appeal, 30 Pa. 168 (Pa. 1858).

30 Pa. 168 (Potts's Appeal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Clark Estate
75 Pa. D. & C.2d 511 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1976)
Keeley v. Moon
22 Pa. D. & C. 239 (Bucks County Court of Common Pleas, 1934)
Heath's Estate
7 Pa. D. & C. 216 (Philadelphia County Orphans' Court, 1926)
Pifer v. Locke
55 A. 790 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1903)
Seybert v. Hibbert
5 Pa. Super. 537 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1897)
Armstrong v. Michener
28 A. 447 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1894)
Estate of Quin
22 A. 965 (Philadelphia County Orphans' Court, 1891)