Potts v. Wells
50 A. 62, 19 Del. 11, 3 Penne. 11, 1900 Del. LEXIS 40
CourtSuperior Court of Delaware
DecidedJune 4, 1900
DocketAction of Assumpsit on a book account No. 183
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 50 A. 62 (Potts v. Wells) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Potts v. Wells, 50 A. 62, 19 Del. 11, 3 Penne. 11, 1900 Del. LEXIS 40 (Del. Ct. App. 1900).
Opinion
The statute says expressly that the defendant in his affidavit must state that there is a legal defense to the whole or a part of the cause of action setting forth the nature- of that ■defense. This affidavit does not admit any part to be due, but simply says there is a defense to the cause of action. We must" therefore order judgment notwithstanding the affidavit of defense.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Short & Walls Lumber Co. v. Shestack
8 A.2d 83 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1939)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
50 A. 62, 19 Del. 11, 3 Penne. 11, 1900 Del. LEXIS 40, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/potts-v-wells-delsuperct-1900.