Potts v. Wells
50 A. 62, 19 Del. 11, 3 Penne. 11, 1900 Del. LEXIS 40
Superior Court of Delaware·Decided June 4, 1900·No. Action of Assumpsit on a book account No. 183·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The statute says expressly that the defendant in his affidavit must state that there is a legal defense to the whole or a part of the cause of action setting forth the nature- of that ■defense. This affidavit does not admit any part to be due, but simply says there is a defense to the cause of action. We must" therefore order judgment notwithstanding the affidavit of defense.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Potts v. Wells, 50 A. 62, 19 Del. 11, 3 Penne. 11, 1900 Del. LEXIS 40 (Del. Ct. App. 1900).
50 A. 62 (Potts v. Wells) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Short & Walls Lumber Co. v. Shestack
8 A.2d 83 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1939)