Potts v. Wellman-Lord Engineering Co.
This text of 202 So. 2d 745 (Potts v. Wellman-Lord Engineering Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
By petitioner for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date April 7, 1967.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e., 32 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
The petition is therefore denied.
The motion of petitioner for attorneys’ fees in this Court is denied.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
202 So. 2d 745, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/potts-v-wellman-lord-engineering-co-fla-1967.