Potts v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Potts v. State

564 S.W.3d 741

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 16, 2018·No. No. ED 106031·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Freddie Potts appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. The motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous, and we affirm.

*742An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Freddie Potts appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. The motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous, and we affirm.

*742An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Potts v. State, 564 S.W.3d 741 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

564 S.W.3d 741 (Potts v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.