Home/Supreme Court of Florida/Potts v. State

Potts v. State

752 So. 2d 554, 24 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 607, 1999 Fla. LEXIS 2168, 1999 WL 1190544
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedDecember 16, 1999
DocketNo. 93,546
StatusPublished

This text of 752 So. 2d 554 (Potts v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Potts v. State, 752 So. 2d 554, 24 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 607, 1999 Fla. LEXIS 2168, 1999 WL 1190544 (Fla. 1999).

Opinion

PARIENTE, J.

We have for review the opinion in Potts v. State, 710 So.2d 1887 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998), which certified conflict with the opinion in State v. Holland, 689 So.2d 1268 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. For the reasons expressed in our opinion in Hayes v. State, 750 So.2d 1 (Fla.1999), the decision of the Fifth District is hereby quashed. We remand to the district court for proceedings consistent with this opinion. It is so ordered.

HARDING, C.J., and SHAW, WELLS, ANSTEAD, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hayes v. State
750 So. 2d 1 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1999)
State v. Holland
689 So. 2d 1268 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
752 So. 2d 554, 24 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 607, 1999 Fla. LEXIS 2168, 1999 WL 1190544, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/potts-v-state-fla-1999.