Potts v. State
752 So. 2d 554, 24 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 607, 1999 Fla. LEXIS 2168, 1999 WL 1190544
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Potts v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 718 So. 2d 757 →
Opinion
We have for review the opinion in Potts v. State, 710 So.2d 1887 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998), which certified conflict with the opinion in State v. Holland, 689 So.2d 1268 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. For the reasons expressed in our opinion in Hayes v. State, 750 So.2d 1 (Fla.1999), the decision of the Fifth District is hereby quashed. We remand to the district court for proceedings consistent with this opinion. It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Potts v. State, 752 So. 2d 554, 24 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 607, 1999 Fla. LEXIS 2168, 1999 WL 1190544 (Fla. 1999).
752 So. 2d 554 (Potts v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hayes v. State
750 So. 2d 1 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1999)
State v. Holland
689 So. 2d 1268 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)