Potts v. Orlando Building Service, Inc.
This text of 206 So. 2d 221 (Potts v. Orlando Building Service, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendants, Jewell S. Potts, Jr., and his wife, Elsie Mae Potts, bring an interlocutory appeal from an order which denied their motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint [222]*222for the enforcement of a mechanics lien. We reverse.
The much amended complaint fails to allege that the affidavit required by Section 84.061(3) (d), F.S.196S, F.S.A. as a prerequisite to institution of suit has been filed.
Such an omission is jurisdictional in nature 1 and requires that the complaint be dismissed.2
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
206 So. 2d 221, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 6014, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/potts-v-orlando-building-service-inc-fladistctapp-1968.