Potts v. . Motor Co.

131 S.E. 739, 191 N.C. 821, 1926 N.C. LEXIS 187
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedMarch 3, 1926
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 131 S.E. 739 (Potts v. . Motor Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Potts v. . Motor Co., 131 S.E. 739, 191 N.C. 821, 1926 N.C. LEXIS 187 (N.C. 1926).

Opinion

Civil action to recover damages. The issues submitted to the jury and their answers thereto, were as follows:

"1. Was the Apperson car destroyed by fire after defendant had received possession of it under the contract sued on? Answer: Yes. *Page 822

"2. Was said fire caused by the negligence of said Cobb Motor Company? Answer: Yes.

"3. What damage is plaintiff entitled to recover from defendant? Answer: $356.00."

There was a judgment rendered on the verdict. Defendant excepted and assigned error. In the record there are six assignments of error made by defendant. We have examined the six assignments of error with care and can find no error in law. The jury has found the facts for plaintiff.

In the judgment there is

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Heath v. Mosley
209 S.E.2d 740 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1974)
Redfoot v. J. T. Jenkins Co.
291 P.2d 134 (California Court of Appeal, 1955)
Prettyman v. Hopkins Motor Co.
81 S.E.2d 78 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1954)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
131 S.E. 739, 191 N.C. 821, 1926 N.C. LEXIS 187, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/potts-v-motor-co-nc-1926.