Potts v. . Motor Co.

131 S.E. 739, 191 N.C. 821, 1926 N.C. LEXIS 187
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided March 3, 1926·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Civil action to recover damages. The issues submitted to the jury and their answers thereto, were as follows:

"1. Was the Apperson car destroyed by fire after defendant had received possession of it under the contract sued on? Answer: Yes. *Page 822

"2. Was said fire caused by the negligence of said Cobb Motor Company? Answer: Yes.

"3. What damage is plaintiff entitled to recover from defendant? Answer: $356.00."

There was a judgment rendered on the verdict. Defendant excepted and assigned error. In the record there are six assignments of error made by defendant. We have examined the six assignments of error with care and can find no error in law. The jury has found the facts for plaintiff.

In the judgment there is

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Potts v. . Motor Co., 131 S.E. 739, 191 N.C. 821, 1926 N.C. LEXIS 187 (N.C. 1926).

131 S.E. 739 (Potts v. . Motor Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Heath v. Mosley
209 S.E.2d 740 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1974)
Redfoot v. J. T. Jenkins Co.
291 P.2d 134 (California Court of Appeal, 1955)
Prettyman v. Hopkins Motor Co.
81 S.E.2d 78 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1954)