Potts v. Kaplan

240 A.D. 884

Opinion

Order affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Finch, P. J., Merrell, Martin, O’Malley and Untermyer, JJ.; Untermyer, J., dissents and votes to reverse and deny the motion. [147 Misc. 573.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Potts v. Kaplan, 240 A.D. 884 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

240 A.D. 884 (Potts v. Kaplan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Potts v. Kaplan
147 Misc. 573 (New York Supreme Court, 1933)