Potts v. Hollen

177 U.S. 365, 20 S. Ct. 654, 44 L. Ed. 808, 1900 U.S. LEXIS 1805
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedApril 12, 1900
Docket143
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 177 U.S. 365 (Potts v. Hollen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Potts v. Hollen, 177 U.S. 365, 20 S. Ct. 654, 44 L. Ed. 808, 1900 U.S. LEXIS 1805 (1900).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Harlan,

after stating the case, delivered the opinion of the court.

The motion to dismiss the present appeal is denied. The land in question is shown to be of greater value than five thousand dollars. In addition to the affidavits filed on the subject of value, the record contains an order made by the Supreme Court of the Territory on the application for appeal stating that more than the above amount was involved in the action. 'This Order we assume was based upon proof as to value.

One of the assignments of error is that the Supreme Court of the Territory erred in holding that the trial court had jurisdiction of the subject of the action and the right to entertain the suit as a proceeding in equity and without a trial by jury.

For the reasons stated in the opinion in Black v. Jackson, just decided, we adjudge that the issue of fact involving the right of possession of the premises in dispute could not properly *370 be determined without the aid of a jury,, unless a jury was waived. "Without repeating what was said in that opinion, we also hold that the case made by the plaintiff was not such as to entitle him to a mandatory injunction.

The decree is reversed and cause remanded for such further proceedings as may be consistent with this opinion.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Charleston National Bank v. Thomas
105 S.E.2d 184 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1958)
Backus v. Abbot
69 S.E.2d 48 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1952)
Alaska Development Co. v. Brannan
275 P. 115 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1929)
Morris v. Gray
1913 OK 108 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
177 U.S. 365, 20 S. Ct. 654, 44 L. Ed. 808, 1900 U.S. LEXIS 1805, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/potts-v-hollen-scotus-1900.