Potts v. Hines

57 Miss. 735
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedApril 15, 1880
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 57 Miss. 735 (Potts v. Hines) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Potts v. Hines, 57 Miss. 735 (Mich. 1880).

Opinion

Campbell J.

delivered the opinion of the court.

The motion to dismiss the case for want of jurisdiction was properly refused. Fenn v. Harrington, 54 Miss. 733. The action was not commenced as to Potts until he was made a party by amendment. Until then, he was a stranger to the action, and would not have been affected by a judgment in it. In suits against lunatics, both the lunatic and his guardian must be served with process. Code 1871, § 705. Before he was made a defendant, the account was barred by the Statute of Limitations of three years, which upon the facts disclosed in evidence applied to it. Floyd v. Pearce, ante, 140. The verdict should have been for the defendant below.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rainwater v. Lamar Life Insurance
381 F. Supp. 2d 581 (S.D. Mississippi, 2005)
Curry v. Turner
832 So. 2d 508 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 2002)
Betty Curry v. Trent Turner
Mississippi Supreme Court, 2000
Dunn Const. Co. v. Bourne
159 So. 841 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1935)
Smith v. Bayright
34 N.J. Eq. 424 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1881)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
57 Miss. 735, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/potts-v-hines-miss-1880.