Potts v. Hayden

249 So. 2d 726, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6423
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 2, 1971
DocketNo. 71-207
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 249 So. 2d 726 (Potts v. Hayden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Potts v. Hayden, 249 So. 2d 726, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6423 (Fla. Ct. App. 1971).

Opinion

ON MOTION TO DISMISS

MANN, Judge.

The order appealed from is not final as to these parties. It is therefore not appeal-able until after final judgment. There is no provision in F.A.R. 4.2, 32 F.S.A., for interlocutory review of a “final” summary judgment on a counterclaim while the main claim between the parties is pending. The motion to dismiss is granted without prejudice to the right of appeal from final judgment. See Midstate Hauling Co. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., Fla.App. 4th 1966, 189 So.2d 826.

PIERCE, C. J., and LILES, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

SLT Warehouse Company v. Webb
304 So. 2d 97 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1974)
Taussig v. Ins. Co. of North America
301 So. 2d 21 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)
S. L. T. Warehouse Co. v. Webb
294 So. 2d 712 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
249 So. 2d 726, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6423, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/potts-v-hayden-fladistctapp-1971.