Potts v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

Fourth Circuit

Potts v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

264 F. App'x 266

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 12, 2008·No. No. 07-7491·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Ben A. Potts appeals the district court’s order dismissing his mandamus action for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Potts v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, No. 7:07-cv-00438-jlk, 2007 WL 2815212 (W.D.Va. Sept. 25, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Ben A. Potts appeals the district court’s order dismissing his mandamus action for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Potts v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, No. 7:07-cv-00438-jlk, 2007 WL 2815212 (W.D.Va. Sept. 25, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED.

Potts v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, 264 F. App'x 266 (4th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

264 F. App'x 266 (Potts v. Federal Bureau of Prisons) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.