Potts v. Celotex Corp.
This text of 914 F.2d 257 (Potts v. Celotex Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Elizabeth Ann POTTS, individually and as next of kin of
Harold Lamar Potts, Deceased, Plaintiff-Petitioner,
v.
THE CELOTEX CORPORATION, et al., Defendants-Respondents.
No. 89-5085.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Sept. 18, 1990.
Before BOYCE F. MARTIN, Jr., and MILBURN, Circuit Judges, and CONTIE, Senior Circuit Judge.
Pursuant to the published opinion of the Tennessee Supreme Court filed on September 10, 1990, the judgment of the district court is reversed and the case is remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
914 F.2d 257, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 24370, 1990 WL 134783, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/potts-v-celotex-corp-ca6-1990.