Potts v. Celotex Corp.

914 F.2d 257, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 24370, 1990 WL 134783
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided September 18, 1990·No. 89-5085·Unpublished

Opinion

914 F.2d 257

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Elizabeth Ann POTTS, individually and as next of kin of
Harold Lamar Potts, Deceased, Plaintiff-Petitioner,
v.
THE CELOTEX CORPORATION, et al., Defendants-Respondents.

No. 89-5085.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Sept. 18, 1990.

Before BOYCE F. MARTIN, Jr., and MILBURN, Circuit Judges, and CONTIE, Senior Circuit Judge.

Pursuant to the published opinion of the Tennessee Supreme Court filed on September 10, 1990, the judgment of the district court is reversed and the case is remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Potts v. Celotex Corp., 914 F.2d 257, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 24370, 1990 WL 134783 (6th Cir. 1990).

914 F.2d 257 (Potts v. Celotex Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related