Potts v. Apfel

Fourth Circuit

Potts v. Apfel

42 F. App'x 653

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 19, 2002·No. No. 02-1647·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Charlotte D. Potts appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the Commissioner in her action seeking judicial review of the Commissioner’s decision to deny her application for disability insurance benefits. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Potts v. Apfel, No. CA-00-865 (E.D.Va. Apr. 15, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Charlotte D. Potts appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the Commissioner in her action seeking judicial review of the Commissioner’s decision to deny her application for disability insurance benefits. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Potts v. Apfel, No. CA-00-865 (E.D.Va. Apr. 15, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Potts v. Apfel, 42 F. App'x 653 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

42 F. App'x 653 (Potts v. Apfel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.