Pottinger v. Hall
This text of 4 H. & McH. 349 (Pottinger v. Hall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering General Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The Court, in the course of the tidal, informed the defendant’s counsel, that they coidd not offer any evidence as to the location of any tract of land, unless such [350]*350tract was located on the plots. That as the deeds offered in evidence by the defendant’s counsel, conveyed by courses and distances, only parts of the tract of land located on the plots by the defendant, the parts conveyed must be located before the deeds can be read in evidence.
On motion of the defendant’s counsel, leave given to add to and amend the plots; a juror was withdrawn* &c. and the cause continued.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
4 H. & McH. 349, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pottinger-v-hall-vagensess-1799.