Pottinger v. Commissioner of Social Security
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA CASE NO. 3:21-cv-05168-JRC Plaintiff, ORDER ON UNOPPOSED v. MOTION FOR EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT FEES AND SECURITY, Defendant.
This matter is before the Court on the parties’ consent (Dkt. 5) and on plaintiff’s unopposed motion for attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412. See Dkt. 25. Based on the EAJA, that defendant has no opposition, the attorney declaration and time and expense itemizations (Dkt. 25-2), and the relevant record, it is hereby ORDERED that EAJA attorney’s fees of $7,520.31 and expenses in the amount of $10.30, shall be awarded to plaintiff pursuant to the EAJA and consistent with Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 588–89 (2010). The Commissioner shall contact the Department of Treasury after the Order for EAJA fees is entered to determine if the EAJA fees are subject to any offset. If it is determined that plaintiff’s EAJA fees are not subject to any offset allowed pursuant to the Department of the Treasury’s Offset Program, then the check for EAJA fees shall be made payable to Eitan Kassel Yanich, based on plaintiff’s assignment of these amounts to plaintiff’s attorney. See Dkt. 27. If
there is an offset, the remainder shall be made payable to plaintiff, based on the practice of the Department of the Treasury. See, e.g., Case No. 2:15-cv-122, Dkt. 22, at 4. Any check for EAJA fees shall be mailed to plaintiff’s counsel, Eitan Kassel Yanich, at Eitan Kassel Yanich, PLLC, 203 Fourth Avenue E., Suite 321, Olympia, WA. 98501 Dated this 13th day of May, 2022. A J. Richard Creatura Chief United States Magistrate Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pottinger v. Commissioner of Social Security (Pottinger v. Commissioner of Social Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.