Pottinger v. City of Miami

Eleventh Circuit

Pottinger v. City of Miami

76 F.3d 1154, 1996 WL 47942

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedFebruary 7, 1996

DocketNos. 91-5316, 92-5145 and 95-4555

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 76 F.3d 1154 (Pottinger v. City of Miami) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pottinger v. City of Miami, 76 F.3d 1154, 1996 WL 47942 (11th Cir. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

INTERIM ORDER:

The panel heard oral argument in this case on January 24, 1996. After hearing oral argument, the panel is of the opinion that this case can be and should be settled.

The panel hereby refers this appeal to the Eleventh Circuit Conference Attorney for settlement discussions, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 33 and Eleventh Circuit Rule 33-1.

The parties and their counsel are directed to contact this court’s Appellate Conference Office not later than fifteen days from receipt of this order to explore a resolution of their differences.

Before settlement discussions, counsel for the parties must consult with their clients and obtain as much authority as feasible to settle the appeal. Counsel and the parties are expected to discuss all issues in good faith.

The conference attorney shall issue an order as contemplated by Eleventh Circuit Rule 33 — 1(d) or issue a report to the panel not later than April 15,1996.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI