Potter's Estate

36 Pa. D. & C. 81, 1939 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 200
Pennsylvania Orphans' Court, Philadelphia County·Decided September 22, 1939·Published

Opinions

Sinkler, J.,

Upon careful consideration of the will which has been construed by the auditing judge, we find the direction in the fourth paragraph of the third clause of the will — the payment of the principal upon the death of either of his said children — unmistakable. In behalf of the surviving daughter, it is argued that the adjudication deprives her of [85]*85the share of income which her father evidently intended she should have. However meritorious this argument, may be, the majority of the court is of the opinion that the auditing judge has correctly interpreted the will.

The exceptions are dismissed, and the adjudication is confirmed absolutely.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Potter's Estate, 36 Pa. D. & C. 81, 1939 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 200 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1939).

36 Pa. D. & C. 81 (Potter's Estate) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Torchiana's Estate
141 A. 294 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1928)
Rapson's Estate
179 A. 436 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1935)
Goodin's Estate
196 A. 1 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1937)
Mayer's Estate
137 A. 627 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1927)
Williamson's Estate
153 A. 765 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1930)
Brennan's Estate
188 A. 160 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1936)