Potter v. Tyndall
This text of 207 S.E.2d 762 (Potter v. Tyndall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Troy D. POTTER, t/a Pamco Farm Service Company, Plaintiff,
v.
Robert TYNDALL, Defendant,
v.
R. C. NOBLE et al., Additional Defendants.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Ward, Tucker, Ward & Smith, P. A, Michael P. Flanagan, for the plaintiff, Potter.
David S. Henderson, for the defendants Noble & Powell.
Barden, Stith, McCotter & Stith, Barnes & Braswell, P. A, for the defendant, Plant Food Company.
Lee & Hancock, Moses D. Lassiter, for the defendant, Tyndall.
Petition of plaintiff (Potter) and additional defendants (Noble, Powell, Plant Food) for writ of certiorari to the North Carolina Court of Appeals to review its decision, 22 N.C.App. 129, 205 S.E.2d 808. Denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
207 S.E.2d 762, 285 N.C. 661, 1974 N.C. LEXIS 1083, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/potter-v-tyndall-nc-1974.