Potter v. . the Park Company
109 N.E. 1090, 215 N.Y. 647, 1915 N.Y. LEXIS 1070
This text of 109 N.E. 1090 (Potter v. . the Park Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Potter v. . the Park Company, 109 N.E. 1090, 215 N.Y. 647, 1915 N.Y. LEXIS 1070 (N.Y. 1915).
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Hiscock, Collin, Cüddeback, Hogan, Cardozo and Seabury, JJ. Absent: Willard Bartlett, Oh. J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
109 N.E. 1090, 215 N.Y. 647, 1915 N.Y. LEXIS 1070, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/potter-v-the-park-company-ny-1915.