Potter v. State
This text of 385 S.W.3d 526 (Potter v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Jason Potter (“Potter”) was convicted, following a jury trial, in the Circuit Court of Caldwell County of (1) possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute; and (2) misdemeanor possession of drug paraphernalia with intent to use, for which he was sentenced to concurrent sentences of ten years and sixty days, respectively. Potter’s convictions were affirmed by this Court in a memorandum pursuant to Rule 30.25(b) in State v. Potter, 283 S.W.3d 309 (Mo.App. W.D.2009). Potter now appeals from the denial of his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, following an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
385 S.W.3d 526, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1479, 2012 WL 5866456, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/potter-v-state-moctapp-2012.