Potter v. State
104 So. 924, 20 Ala. App. 692
This text of 104 So. 924 (Potter v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Potter v. State, 104 So. 924, 20 Ala. App. 692 (Ala. Ct. App. 1925).
Opinion
This appellant, defendant below, when arraigned upon the indictment, for answer thereto interposed a plea of guilty as charged therein. But, notwithstanding this plea, he took an appeal from the judgment of conviction. The cause is here submitted upon the record, which is without error. Manifestly this appeal was for delay. The .judgment of the circuit court is affirmed. Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
104 So. 924, 20 Ala. App. 692, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/potter-v-state-alactapp-1925.