Potter v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Potter v. State

104 So. 924, 20 Ala. App. 692

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Potter v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 19 Ala. App. 187 →

Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided April 21, 1925·No. 4 Div. 79.·Published

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

This appellant, defendant below, when arraigned upon the indictment, for answer thereto interposed a plea of guilty as charged therein. But, notwithstanding this plea, he took an appeal from the judgment of conviction. The cause is here submitted upon the record, which is without error. Manifestly this appeal was for delay. The .judgment of the circuit court is affirmed. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, P. J.

This appellant, defendant below, when arraigned upon the indictment, for answer thereto interposed a plea of guilty as charged therein. But, notwithstanding this plea, he took an appeal from the judgment of conviction. The cause is here submitted upon the record, which is without error. Manifestly this appeal was for delay. The .judgment of the circuit court is affirmed. Affirmed.

Potter v. State, 104 So. 924, 20 Ala. App. 692 (Ala. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

104 So. 924 (Potter v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.