Potter v. Spilman
117 Mass. 322, 1875 Mass. LEXIS 227
Opinion
The question argued by the counsel is but a moot point. Upon the facts in the report, the payee of the policy, whatever her rights therein may be, is under no obligation, by law or contract, to assign the policy to the plaintiff, nor the insurance company to assent to any assignment thereof.
Bill dismissed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Potter v. Spilman, 117 Mass. 322, 1875 Mass. LEXIS 227 (Mass. 1875).
117 Mass. 322 (Potter v. Spilman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Concordia Fire Ins. Co. of Milwaukee v. McCarty Motor Co.
45 S.W.2d 446 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1931)
Atkins v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States
132 Mass. 395 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1882)