Potter v. Richards

10 Wend. 607
New York Supreme Court·Decided February 15, 1834·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

By the Court,

Savage, Ch. J.

A taxation was undoubtedly proper; there was a suit pending, and in a proceeding had therein, the defendant became entitled to costs, which could be liquidated only by taxation. I am of opinion, however, that the commissioner erred in the taxation. Besides fees to officers, the statute allows costs and expenses incurred by the defendant; these terms do not moan all expenses which may be incurred ; they mean only taxable costs. When the legislature intend to give a party his disbursements, they use that term; they have not done so here, and the defendant can have no other fees', costs or expenses, than are provided by statute. A retaxation, therefore, is ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Potter v. Richards, 10 Wend. 607 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1834).

10 Wend. 607 (Potter v. Richards) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Apperson v. Mutual Benefit Life Insurance
38 N.J.L. 388 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1876)
Van Hovenburgh v. Case
4 Hill & Den. 541 (Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors, 1842)
Superintendents of the Poor of the Ontario v. Moore
12 Wend. 273 (New York Supreme Court, 1835)