Potter v. Patterson
This text of 700 So. 2d 510 (Potter v. Patterson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[511]*511In re Westinghouse Electric Corp.; Shirley, Lou; Kimball, Ed; Entergy New Orleans Inc.; John Crane Inc.; Reilly-Benton; Flintkote; Fibreboard Corporation; Richard Klinger Inc.; Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp.; Garlock Inc.; Anchor Packing; Taylor-Seidenbach Inc.; Armstrong World Industries; McCarty Corporation; — Defendants); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court, Div. “G”, No. 88-16051; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Nos. 96CA-1172, 96CA-1739.
Denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
700 So. 2d 510, 1997 La. LEXIS 2827, 1997 WL 572678, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/potter-v-patterson-la-1997.