Potter v. Owen

Indiana Supreme Court

Potter v. Owen

18 Ind. 383

DecidedMay 15, 1862

StatusPublished

This text of 18 Ind. 383 (Potter v. Owen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Potter v. Owen, 18 Ind. 383 (Ind. 1862).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The appellees, as assignees of a promissorv [384]*384note, sued Potter, who was the defendant, and judgment by default was entered against him; but no motion appears to have been made in the lower Court to set aside the default. Ror does it appear that any exception, in any form, was taken in the progress of the cause. The appeal is, therefore, not properly before us.

J. G. Dunn, for the appellant.

The appeal is dismissed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The appellees, as assignees of a promissorv [384]*384note, sued Potter, who was the defendant, and judgment by default was entered against him; but no motion appears to have been made in the lower Court to set aside the default. Ror does it appear that any exception, in any form, was taken in the progress of the cause. The appeal is, therefore, not properly before us.

J. G. Dunn, for the appellant.

The appeal is dismissed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 Ind. 383, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/potter-v-owen-ind-1862.