Potter v. Nixon

91 A. 1070, 82 N.J. Eq. 661, 12 Buchanan 661, 1914 N.J. LEXIS 358
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided March 16, 1914·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Learning.

For affirmance—The Chiee-Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisci-i, Bogert, Vredenburgi-i, Congdon, White, Heppenheimer—13. For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Potter v. Nixon, 91 A. 1070, 82 N.J. Eq. 661, 12 Buchanan 661, 1914 N.J. LEXIS 358 (N.J. 1914).

91 A. 1070 (Potter v. Nixon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Wehrhane's Estate
124 A.2d 334 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1956)