Potter v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad
140 A.D. 939, 125 N.Y.S. 1140
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1910·Published
Opinion
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. See opinion by Spring, J., on former appeal in same case, reported at 134 Appellate Division, 837. All concurred, except McLennan, P. J., and Robson; J., who dissented upon the ground that the evidence fails to establish any further duty of defendant as to giving signals at the crossing in question than that required at the ordinary farm crossing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Potter v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad, 140 A.D. 939, 125 N.Y.S. 1140 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1910).
140 A.D. 939 (Potter v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.