Potter v. McLeary
This text of 739 N.W.2d 866 (Potter v. McLeary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Brian POTTER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Richard C. McLEARY, M.D., Gary Augustyn, M.D., and St. Joseph Mercy Hospital Ann Arbor, d/b/a Trinity Health-Michigan, Defendants, and
Robert Domeier, D.O., Emergency Physicians Medical Group, P.C., Kristyn H. Murry, M.D., and Huron Valley Radiology, P.C., Defendants-Appellees.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
*867 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 6, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE the portion of the judgment of the Court of Appeals dismissing the complaint with prejudice, because the dismissal should have been without prejudice as to the affidavit of merit issue. See Kirkaldy v. Rim, 478 Mich. 581, 734 N.W.2d 201 (2007). Accordingly, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration of the defendants' other issues that were not addressed in its opinion. In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
739 N.W.2d 866, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/potter-v-mcleary-mich-2007.