Home/Supreme Court of New Jersey/Potter v. Lumsden

Potter v. Lumsden

117 A. 31, 93 N.J. Eq. 476, 8 Stock. 476, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 318
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided February 9, 1922·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Fielder.

[484]*484For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Swayze, Trenohard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Buskirk — 13. For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Potter v. Lumsden, 117 A. 31, 93 N.J. Eq. 476, 8 Stock. 476, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 318 (N.J. 1922).

117 A. 31 (Potter v. Lumsden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gaub v. Nassau Homes, Inc.
147 A.2d 73 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1958)
Picconi v. Carlin
123 A.2d 87 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1956)
Lampros v. Tenore
60 A.2d 80 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1948)
Casriel v. King
58 A.2d 269 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1948)
Brown v. Green
6 R.I. Dec. 123 (Superior Court of Rhode Island, 1930)