Home/Supreme Court of New Jersey/Potter v. Lumsden

Potter v. Lumsden

117 A. 31, 93 N.J. Eq. 476, 8 Stock. 476, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 318
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedFebruary 9, 1922
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 117 A. 31 (Potter v. Lumsden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Potter v. Lumsden, 117 A. 31, 93 N.J. Eq. 476, 8 Stock. 476, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 318 (N.J. 1922).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Fielder.

[484]*484For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Swayze, Trenohard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Buskirk — 13. For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gaub v. Nassau Homes, Inc.
147 A.2d 73 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1958)
Picconi v. Carlin
123 A.2d 87 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1956)
Lampros v. Tenore
60 A.2d 80 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1948)
Casriel v. King
58 A.2d 269 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1948)
Brown v. Green
6 R.I. Dec. 123 (Superior Court of Rhode Island, 1930)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
117 A. 31, 93 N.J. Eq. 476, 8 Stock. 476, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 318, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/potter-v-lumsden-nj-1922.