Potter v. Lee

Fourth Circuit

Potter v. Lee

615 F. App'x 803

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 11, 2015·No. No. 15-1670·Published

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Isaac A. Potter, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Potter v. Lee, No. l:15-cv-00695-LMB-JFA (E,D.Va. June 5, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Isaac A. Potter, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Potter v. Lee, No. l:15-cv-00695-LMB-JFA (E,D.Va. June 5, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Potter v. Lee, 615 F. App'x 803 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

615 F. App'x 803 (Potter v. Lee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related