Potter v. . Hodgman
70 N.E. 1094, 178 N.Y. 580, 1904 N.Y. LEXIS 799
Opinion
Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered for defendant on the stipulation, with costs, on opinion below.
Concur: Parker, Ch, J., Gray, O’Brien, Haight, Martin, Cullen and Werner, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Potter v. . Hodgman, 70 N.E. 1094, 178 N.Y. 580, 1904 N.Y. LEXIS 799 (N.Y. 1904).
70 N.E. 1094 (Potter v. . Hodgman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
King v. Pelkofski
229 N.E.2d 435 (New York Court of Appeals, 1967)
Reguera v. Calderon
27 A.D.2d 371 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1967)
King v. Pelkofski
24 A.D.2d 1003 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1965)
In re Kamhi
147 Misc. 620 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1933)
Bostwick v. Hall
191 A.D. 610 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1920)