Potter v. Hannibal & St. Joseph Railroad

18 Mo. App. 694, 1885 Mo. App. LEXIS 397
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedJuly 6, 1885
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 18 Mo. App. 694 (Potter v. Hannibal & St. Joseph Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Potter v. Hannibal & St. Joseph Railroad, 18 Mo. App. 694, 1885 Mo. App. LEXIS 397 (Mo. Ct. App. 1885).

Opinion

Opinion by

Hall, J.

The court should have given the declaration of law asked by defendant.

[699]*699There was no duty imposed by law upon the defendant to ring the bell of the engine or to sonnd its whistle at the place of the accident; and under the facts of this case it was not negligence for the defendant to neither ring the bell nor sonnd the whistle.

As a matter of law no rate of speed is prescribed at which a train may run (Young v. R. R. Co. 79 Mo. 340); and in this case, under the evidence, it was not negligence for the defendant’s train to run ab the rate of twenty-five miles per hour.

For these reasons the judgment of the circuit court is reversed and the cause is remanded.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Long v. Louis, Keokuk & Northwestern Railway Co.
23 Mo. App. 178 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1886)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 Mo. App. 694, 1885 Mo. App. LEXIS 397, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/potter-v-hannibal-st-joseph-railroad-moctapp-1885.