Potter v. Dallas County

225 S.W.3d 611, 2006 Tex. App. LEXIS 6371, 2006 WL 2042987
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided July 21, 2006·No. 08-06-00164-CV·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

OPINION

DAVID WELLINGTON CHEW, Justice.

Appellant Carol Potter a/k/a Carol Wallace wrote a handwritten letter dated May 15, 2006, which was filed in this Court on June 12, 2006, stating she wished to withdraw her appeal. We construe Appellants letter as a motion to dismiss the appeal pursuant to Rule 42.1(a)(1) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Pending before the Court is Appellants motion to dismiss the appeal. We have considered this cause on the motion and conclude that the motion should be granted. Accordingly, we grant Appellants motion to dismiss and dismiss this appeal. Costs in this Court áre taxed against Appellant. See Tex.R.App.P. 42.1(d).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Potter v. Dallas County, 225 S.W.3d 611, 2006 Tex. App. LEXIS 6371, 2006 WL 2042987 (Tex. Ct. App. 2006).

225 S.W.3d 611 (Potter v. Dallas County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In the Interest of T.R.B.
225 S.W.3d 611 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2006)