Potter v. Cincinnati, I. & W. R.

272 F. 688, 1921 U.S. App. LEXIS 1682
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
DecidedJanuary 18, 1921
DocketNo. 2836
StatusPublished

This text of 272 F. 688 (Potter v. Cincinnati, I. & W. R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Potter v. Cincinnati, I. & W. R., 272 F. 688, 1921 U.S. App. LEXIS 1682 (7th Cir. 1921).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, among others, was made defendant to a bill for the sale of a railroad, and he admitted the allegations of the bill. For his failure- to raise, by cross-bill or otherwise, any issue in the trial court respecting the affirmative rights which he is endeavoring to assert here, the decree is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
272 F. 688, 1921 U.S. App. LEXIS 1682, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/potter-v-cincinnati-i-w-r-ca7-1921.