Potter v. Campbell

247 A.D. 867

Opinion

Order denying plaintiffs’ motion to dismiss the first counterclaim contained in defendant’s answer on the ground that it appears on the face of said counterclaim that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., McAvoy, O’Malley, Dore and Cohn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Potter v. Campbell, 247 A.D. 867 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

247 A.D. 867 (Potter v. Campbell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.