Potter v. Browne

125 A.D. 640, 109 N.Y.S. 1075, 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2852
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 24, 1908·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Gaynor, J.:

We are not asked to review the evidence, but to reverse on an exception to the admission of evidence.' A former, employe of the plaintiff was a witness for the defendant, and the plaintiff was permitted to testify in rebuttal that he upbraided him for misappropriation of funds and brutally beating a boy in discharging him therefor. It is always relevant and material for a party to prove any fact from which it may be found that a witness of the other side is hostile to or biased against him (People v. Brooks, 131 N. Y. 321; Garnsey v. Rhodes, 138 id. 461; Lamb v. Lamb, 146 id. 317; Brank v. Stratton, 176 id. 150). It is not a collateral [641]*641but a material and relevant matter, and the denial of the witness on cross-examination is therefore not conclusive.

The judgment should be affirmed.

Woodward, Jerks, Hooker and Miller, JJ., concurred.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Potter v. Browne, 125 A.D. 640, 109 N.Y.S. 1075, 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2852 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1908).

125 A.D. 640 (Potter v. Browne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lunham v. Lunham
133 A.D. 215 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1909)