Potter v. Brown County

14 N.W. 375, 56 Wis. 272, 1882 Wisc. LEXIS 298
CourtWisconsin Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 12, 1882
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 14 N.W. 375 (Potter v. Brown County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Potter v. Brown County, 14 N.W. 375, 56 Wis. 272, 1882 Wisc. LEXIS 298 (Wis. 1882).

Opinion

Oetoh, J.

This action was to set aside and cancel certain tax certificates on the plaintiff’s land, and enjoin the issuing of tax deeds thereon, on the ground of the assessment being illegal and void, and other defects in the proceedings going to the groundwork of the tax. There was no appearance or answer. There is no hill of exceptions, and whether the court had any evidence before it or not, we cannot know; but it must be presumed it had, if necessary; but under the second subdivision óf sec. 2891, R. S., no evidence is necessary in such case, except to enable the court to give judgment. There were no findings of fact, and in such case, where there is no issue, none need be made. Sec. 2863, R. S.; Krause v. Krause, 23 Wis., 354. The main point urged in the brief of the learned counsel of the appellant is that the circuit court should have stayed all proceedings in this casé, without final judgment, until a reassessment could be made, under sec. 12105, R. S. But that section only requires such stay, of proceedings “in actions hereafter tried upon issue joined in any of the courts,” etc. Here there was no issue joined, and of course there was no trial, for “ a trial is a judicial examination of the issues between the parties,” etc. Sec., 2842, R. S. It is therefore clear that a stay of proceedings was not necessary in this case, it not being a case within the terms of the above statute, and to extend that statute to such a case would be judicial legislation.

There appear to be no errors in the record.

By the Court.— The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tesch v. Industrial Commission
229 N.W. 194 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1930)
Sibley v. Weinberg
92 N.W. 427 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1902)
Hroch v. Aultman & Taylor Co.
54 N.W. 269 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1893)
Cole v. Custer County Agricultural, Mineral & Stock Ass'n
52 N.W. 1086 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1892)
Fifield v. Marinette County
22 N.W. 705 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1885)
Pratt v. Lincoln County
20 N.W. 726 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1884)
Griggs v. St. Croix Co.
20 F. 341 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Wisconsin, 1884)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
14 N.W. 375, 56 Wis. 272, 1882 Wisc. LEXIS 298, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/potter-v-brown-county-wis-1882.