Potter v. Bennett

Indiana Supreme Court

Potter v. Bennett

16 Ind. 175, 1861 Ind. LEXIS 65

DecidedMay 30, 1861

StatusPublished

This text of 16 Ind. 175 (Potter v. Bennett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Potter v. Bennett, 16 Ind. 175, 1861 Ind. LEXIS 65 (Ind. 1861).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Suit on note; judgment for the plaintiff. No motion was made to have the cause certified to the Circuit Court on ‘account of title to real estate coming in question. It does not appear by the record, that there was any controversy on the trial about the title to real estate. The judgment is affirmed, on the authority of Harvey v. Dakin, 12 In. 481.

The judgment is affirmed, with 1 per cent, damages and costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Suit on note; judgment for the plaintiff. No motion was made to have the cause certified to the Circuit Court on ‘account of title to real estate coming in question. It does not appear by the record, that there was any controversy on the trial about the title to real estate. The judgment is affirmed, on the authority of Harvey v. Dakin, 12 In. 481.

The judgment is affirmed, with 1 per cent, damages and costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

16 Ind. 175, 1861 Ind. LEXIS 65, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/potter-v-bennett-ind-1861.