Potter v. Ashhurst

54 N.J. Eq. 699

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided June 15, 1896·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Decree affirmed, for the reasons given in the court of chancery.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Depue, Dixon, Garrison, Gummere, Lippincott, Ludlow, Magie, Yan Syckel, Barkalow, Bogert, Nixon — 12.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Potter v. Ashhurst, 54 N.J. Eq. 699 (N.J. 1896).

Pincite

54 N.J. Eq. 699 (Potter v. Ashhurst) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.