Potter v. Ashhurst

54 N.J. Eq. 699
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJune 15, 1896
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 54 N.J. Eq. 699 (Potter v. Ashhurst) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Potter v. Ashhurst, 54 N.J. Eq. 699 (N.J. 1896).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Decree affirmed, for the reasons given in the court of chancery.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Depue, Dixon, Garrison, Gummere, Lippincott, Ludlow, Magie, Yan Syckel, Barkalow, Bogert, Nixon — 12.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. Robert
178 A.2d 185 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1962)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
54 N.J. Eq. 699, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/potter-v-ashhurst-nj-1896.